My mum served her country in the Second World War and now wants to enjoy the peace that she and many thousands of others fought for. Something we always remember at this time of year.
29th October 2010
Dear Graham
As the formal consultation process draws to a close I have, as leader of the Bowles Lodge Stays! Campaign, a proposal that I ask you to consider. I do so in the firm belief that you have not yet decided on the future of Bowles Lodge. I appreciate that your decision will not be easy due to the pressure from your professional officers, government policy, the PFI aspect and campaigners against closure like us! I have confidence that you will weigh all the submissions carefully and independently as a politician elected by the people of Kent, to protect and enhance the quality of life for the very frail and elderly residents and day centre attendees. This is a major political and public decision!
By far the SAFEST option is to let the current permanent residents carry on living at Bowles Lodge until their death. Five have died since the consultation was announced. In my view the temporary decision not to accept any more permanent residents pending the outcome of the consultation, which I support, should be made permanent. I propose that the places (and these will increase until all the remaining permanent residents have died) be turned into an Enhanced Advanced Respite Centre that could attract Beacon Status and a centre of excellence. This is a great opportunity to tap directly into the money announced in last week’s Spending Review for adult social care that seeks to tackle the, quite frankly, ludicrous battles that have taken place over the years between the NHS and local authorities about who pays for what and whether a person’s needs are purely social or medical. In truth the edges have always been and always will be blurred. I welcome the Government’s approach.
Partnership with the NHS in this Centre will challenge the main current purpose of respite care – giving family, friends and carers a much needed break. If Dorothy Lucy Centre is retained it could focus on this traditional form of respite.
Here are the key points behind my rationale and criteria:
· Elderly people who are admitted to hospital for an acute reason are then often transferred to convalesce and recover in cottage hospitals. These will be the type of temporary resident in this Centre. It means they can be discharged earlier from cottage hospitals providing they are free of contagious infections.
· The approach at cottage hospitals such as Sevenoaks and Hawkhurst is to have multidisciplinary teams working with patients to assist in their healing, recuperation and to build sufficient strength for them to return to independent or semi-independent living (at home with/without carers or in Extra Care accommodation).
· Hospital beds in acute hospitals are extremely expensive and beds in cottage hospitals are expensive.
· The Enhanced Respite Centre will take people that are infection free and provide a programme of activities with the prime purpose of assisting them to live independent and semi-independent lives.
· It will also take people that are considered to be at risk of an acute admission to hospital such as a sequence of falls. This proactive approach could save thousands of pounds and enable them to return home stronger with the intervention of the falls team and other staff.
· Carers, friends and family could also be invited to attend group classes (particularly falls prevention exercises) at the Centre which encourages participation and mutual support as progress can be celebrated.
· The partnership between the NHS and Kent County Council is crucial though I propose that even this be widened to form a comprehensive and cohesive multi-disciplinary/multi-dimensional approach.
· Many of the existing care staff team have all the skills necessary to assist in helping people with their social needs.
· This team should be supplemented by the expertise of a falls team (one of the biggest factors for re-admission to hospital) which could be two people – a physiotherapist and an occupational therapist. This would also encourage increased physical movement, build weak muscles and sense of well being.
· They would work with each resident and help them back into living in their own accommodation.
· Existing district nurse provision may be sufficient or could be stepped up due to the higher demands of the anticipated resident group.
· I propose a team of volunteers be recruited who can spend time getting to know and befriend residents and people there for enhanced respite – particularly those who have a history of social isolation and feel like they have little control of their destinies and those whose relatives live more than 25 miles away which is likely as the centre would be a Kent-wide resource.
· The current social, educational and physical activities, much of which is funded by donation, through the dedicated Friends of Bowles Lodge, will continue.
The Day Centre should be retained as it becomes an integral part of the Centre. People that are suitable for living independently can attend every day to ease the transition. This may require a few reserved places.
There are challenges having people with different needs in the same home but, so long as no-one is admitted with a contagious infection then I think this can be managed. As the current permanent resident population decreases through death, which has already been reduced by 15% in three months) then the Centre can be exclusively for enhanced respite.
I believe this proposal is the safest option for my mother and the other permanent residents at Bowles Lodge and that it gives Kent County Council an opportunity to enhance its reputation in the UK by creating an enhanced facility that Hawkhurst and the rest of Kent tax payers will be proud of and may need soon or in the future.
I appreciate that retaining Bowles Lodge and gradually transforming its function will be logistically challenging and that another site will need to be found if the full PFI Extra Care project is to proceed. Elderly people that would normally be placed in Kent County Council’s residential homes for the elderly and are unsuitable for Extra Care can be placed by block or spot contracts in the independent sector.
I have consulted the Care Quality Commission whether this gradual shift in use from permanent care to enhanced respite care would mean that the existing provision of non en-suite facilities at Bowles Lodge would be a problem with the new rules and they said no so long as there are toilet facilities within a short distance of bedrooms and lounges which is the case.
With an increasing aging population Kent is adopting a good approach by providing a range of options such as Extra Care. The Enhanced Respite Centre widens that range and facilitates independence thus preventing the need for permanent residential care or extremely expensive nursing care.
I have included the political and reputation dimensions in this proposal because they can significantly influence what the public thinks, perceives and feels about public authorities that they fund. Kent County Council is all too aware, as an excellent rated local authority, how tough it can be to sustain this standard as its children’s service is all too aware!
Thank you for all your work and willingness to discuss these vital issues that may impact positively or negatively on the life or death of those most vulnerable in our society. I and our campaigning team are confident that you will carefully consider this proposal and we look forward to a favourable decision so that Bowles Lodge Stays! will no longer be needed.
I am sending this to you today, Friday 29th October and copying it to Greg Clark MP who I met with this week at the House of Commons and Roger Manning, your colleague county councillor whose constituency includes Bowles Lodge. I will post this proposal on the Bowles Lodge Stays! Blog on Monday 1st November and release it to the media and all other interested parties the same day.
Regards
John Porter
Campaign Leader
Bowles Lodge Stays!
No comments:
Post a Comment